Chun and Cho: Postoperative ultrasonography of the musculoskeletal system


Ultrasonography of the postoperative musculoskeletal system plays an important role in the accurate diagnosis of abnormal lesions in the bone and soft tissues. Ultrasonography is a fast and reliable method with no harmful irradiation for the evaluation of postoperative musculoskeletal complications. In particular, it is not affected by the excessive metal artifacts that appear on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Another benefit of ultrasonography is its capability to dynamically assess the pathologic movement in joints, muscles, or tendons. This article discusses the frequent applications of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in various postoperative situations including those involving the soft tissues around the metal hardware, arthroplasty, postoperative tendons, recurrent soft tissue tumors, bone unions, and amputation surgery.


Musculoskeletal ultrasonography plays an important role after orthopedic surgery. After surgery using metal hardware, susceptibility artifacts due to the ferromagnetic material on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and beam-hardening streak artifacts on computed tomography (CT) often prevent an accurate evaluation of abnormal lesions in the bone and soft tissues around the metal hardware. In contrast, artifacts from metal hardware on ultrasound are less distinct [1,2]. Ultrasonography cannot see within the joint or into the bone around the metal hardware. However, an added advantage of ultrasonography is its ability to perform dynamic imaging to permit the evaluation of joint, muscle, and tendon motion. Further, its real-time nature can guide an interventional procedure. Ultrasonography can be used for accurately diagnosing various abnormalities including tendon tear, joint effusion, and infection in a postoperative orthopedic patient. Ultrasonography is also a crucial tool for detecting the recurrence of soft tissue tumors, bone unions, and complications after amputation surgery [2]. This article discusses the frequent applications of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in various postoperative situations. In particular, the ultrasonographic findings of postoperative lesions and pitfalls are discussed.

Soft Tissues around Metal Hardware

After orthopedic surgery, an evaluation of the soft tissues around the metal hardware is often necessary. Ultrasonography is an excellent modality that can diagnose conditions that may occur postoperatively, such as joint effusion, soft tissue infection (Fig. 1), hematoma (Fig. 2), and bursitis [1-5]. Tendon or ligament abnormalities can also be examined easily with ultrasonography. When a tendon is found adjacent to the metal hardware, it is important to note that the condition may develop into tendon rupture or tenosynovitis. In such cases, a dynamic study can be used for accurately evaluating whether tendon impingement is causing the symptoms or not.
Ultrasonography may be useful for detecting joint effusion, indicating joint abnormality. Superficial joints including those of the knee, ankle, elbow, and wrist can be visualized easily. Joint recesses filled with an anechoic fluid can be identified. However, larger joints such as the shoulder joint or the pelvic girdle are located further from the ultrasonography transducer; therefore, the detection of a joint effusion becomes more difficult in these cases. This dilemma becomes more complex after surgery as the normal anatomic guideline and the tissue echogenicity may be changed. Further, following total hip arthroplasty, a pseudocapsule with soft tissues may look like a hypoechoic area along the femoral neck and can be confused for a joint effusion [5,6]. In general, a significant joint effusion and irregular distension of the pseudocapsule along with an extra-articular fluid or abscess are sufficient for diagnosing joint infections (Fig. 3). Additional color or power Doppler imaging may be useful for increasing diagnostic confidence in the case of infections. If needed, joint aspiration may be attempted under ultrasonography or fluoroscopy guidance.
Ultrasonography can evaluate for soft tissue infection around the metal hardware outside of the joints. Fluid collection and hyperemia of the soft tissue around the metal hardware might be a sign of infection (Fig. 4). Occasionally, hypoechoic periprosthetic soft tissue edema may present immediately after surgery and can appear similar to an infection. In such a case, the patient’s clinical history as well as symptoms must be carefully observed, and serial follow-up ultrasonography could be helpful in differentiating between an infection and reactive edema. If necessary, ultrasound-guided aspiration should be considered [2].


An evaluation of imaging can be problematic in patients with symptomatic arthroplasty and should be tailored to the clinical request. Ultrasonography can aid in the detection of the pathology of an arthroplasty joint and the adjacent soft tissue structures.
A common application of ultrasonography after shoulder arthrography is to evaluate the status of the rotator cuff that suffers from postoperative pain, weakness, and limited motion [4,7]. Ultrasonography is carried out using a method similar to the ultrasonography of a native shoulder. The prosthetic humeral head can be seen deep past the rotator cuff as a hyperechogenicity with a posterior reverberation artifact. Several signs that indicate a rotator cuff tear are the same as those in the case of a native shoulder. Findings of a full-thickness tear include a focal discontinuity with an interposed hypoechoic or anechoic fluid, nonvisualization of the tendon, or deltoid muscle into the vacant tendon. The criteria for determining partial cuff tears are somewhat controversial and may include a thinned or thickened relatively heterogeneous-appearing tendon and a hypoechoic defect in the tendon. Atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles associated with a chronic tear usually demonstrates fatty infiltration, leading to decreased size and increased echogenicity [7,8].
The detection of a hip effusion, which is indicative of the joint pathology including an infection, is probably a major indication of ultrasonography of the symptomatic hip after arthroplasty. Other indications include the evaluation of an iliopsoas tendon, a periprosthetic hematoma in patients with persistent wound drainage, an acetabular element, or bursitis (Fig. 5) appearing as a septated cystic mass [6].
Anterior knee pain is common after total knee arthroplasty. Abnormalities of the patellar tendon are even more common. Ultrasonography can identify these abnormalities in the tendon without being affected by metal artifacts. Flexion and extension during the examination can be helpful in distinguishing a complete rupture with no retraction from a partial tear. Ultrasonography can also be used to identify capsular thickening, which can be a cause of stiffness after arthroplasty. Joint space narrowing after arthroplasty is due to wear of the polyethylene. This is identifiable most effectively by serial radiographs, but ultrasonography is an alternative modality [2,7].

Postoperative Tendon

In comparison to research dealing with an ultrasonographic diagnosis of tendon abnormalities prior to surgery, there is little literature available that deals with postoperative or repaired tendons [9-13]. In general, for repaired tendons, the echogenicity varies from hyperechoic to hypoechoic. A normal fibrillar pattern may or may not be seen completely. These changes indicate varying degrees of granulation tissue or scar remodeling. A postoperative tendon may be thickened or thinned. The criteria for a tendon tear before an operation include abnormal hypoechoic area, loss of the fibrillar pattern, and tendon thinning. These criteria cannot be directly applied to an assessment of the postoperative tendon. Further, ultrasonography may be used for evaluating tendon integrity and recognizing a peritendinous abnormality [9,10]. A dynamic study using ultrasonography is helpful for the diagnosis of a tendon tear. In this situation, tendon movement can be evaluated by moving the extremity or palpating the muscle. Retraction of the tendon end without the tendon sliding motion crossing the repair area is indicative of a full-thickness tear. This dynamic study is most effective in the evaluation of a single tendon [11].

Rotator Cuff Tendon

A majority of postoperative tendon research focuses on rotator cuff repair. A repaired rotator cuff tendon shows a heterogeneous echogenicity with peribursal soft tissue thickening. Normal fibrillar architecture may or may not be present. There may be hyperechoic suture material within the repaired tendon. A cortical irregularity along the greater tuberosity is often seen at the suture anchor surface (Fig. 6). The suture material may create posterior acoustic shadowing or reverberation artifacts (Fig. 7). Reverberation is the persistence of sound in an enclosed space after its generation. This is due to continuously repeated echoes between anatomic interfaces, which are strong reflectors [9,10,13]. Hypoechoic defects within a repair may persist for several years. This is suggestive of a granulation tissue rather than a true retear within the repair (Fig. 8). Doppler imaging may be helpful in differentiation because the presence of vascularity within the defect indicates granulation [13]. A true tear can be definitely diagnosed with the identification of the intervening fluid that redistributes when the transducer is pressed against the repaired tendon (Fig. 9). Other evidence of a retear includes a dislodged suture anchor, broken suture, or retracted tendon ends. If the retear is massive, the tendon may not be visible completely (Fig. 10). Extensive joint effusion or peribursal fluid collection with a coexisting inflammatory response can be seen [10].

Achilles Tendon

The Achilles tendon is the most commonly injured of all the ankle tendons. The repaired Achilles tendon retains increased thickness for at least 2 years, and shows decreased echogenicity without a retear. A pathologic specimen of a repaired Achilles tendon shows loss of the fibrillar tendon structure, decreased collagen, increased non-collagenous extracellular matrix, and focal variations in cellularity [11,14]. In general, the vascularity within the tendon is not increased, but there might be a subtle increase during the initial healing process. Vascular regression continues as the scar matures, and a fibrous, avascular scar is eventually formed. If there is increased vascularity 2 years after surgery, a re-injury might be indicated. The area of the retear appears as an anechoic or hypoechoic defect (Fig. 11) [11,12].
Postoperative complications include infection, ossification, suture granuloma, and peritendinous adhesion. If there is an infection, an anechoic abscess may be seen within the tendon and the vascularity at the periphery of the abscess is sharply increased. Ossification appears as a hyperechogenicity with posterior acoustic shadowing. A suture granuloma appears as a hypoechoic lesion. Sometimes, it is difficult to differentiate it from a small abscess. Peritendinous adhesion, formed by the accumulated scar tissue around the repair site, interferes with tendon gliding. Scar formation provides the initial physical continuity at the repair site, but a scar proliferation attachment to the surrounding tissue is not expected. The border of the tendon is indistinct and there are hypoechoic areas around the repaired tendon [11].

Recurrent Soft Tissue Tumors

Ultrasonography can be applied to an assessment of a recurrent or remaining lesion after the treatment of soft tissue tumors [15,16]. A solid soft tissue mass is typically hypoechoic with a well-defined margin, while postoperative soft tissue fluid collection is anechoic with an uneven shape and poorly-defined margins. If the fluid collection is round and mass-like, it will be compressed easily by using the transducer. If there is posterior enhancement, it is likely to be fluid collection rather than a solid mass (Fig. 12). However, tumor necrosis or hemorrhage can occur, and the tumor may contain both solid and cystic internal components. If it is difficult to differentiate between a localized fluid collection and a recurrent or remaining tumor, ultrasound-guided aspiration and biopsy may be necessary. Ultrasonography performs better than CT and is comparable to MRI in the identification of soft tissue tumor recurrence. MRI should still be considered if the ultrasonography is inconclusive [17,18].

Bone Union

Ultrasonography may be used for a clinical evaluation of a malunion or a nonunion after internal fixation using an intramedullary nail. The fracture area is systematically assessed in the longitudinal and transverse scans. The formation of continuous echogenic callus with no identification of the intramedullary nail at the fracture sites represents a union. On the other hand, the interruption of an echoic cortical outline with a posterior reverberation artifact due to an intramedullary nail represents a nonunion [19]. Further, ultrasonography can be used to accurately evaluate a limb lengthening procedure by using the Ilizarov technique. New bone formation can be detected with ultrasonography before its radiographic recognition. The ultrasonographic appearance of a new bone includes echogenic foci within the distraction site, which become aligned in the longitudinal plane [20]. A cyst or fluid that is present in the distraction gap signifies the slow formation of the new bone compared with the rate of limb lengthening. Ultrasoundguided fluid aspiration is beneficial because fluid collection may interfere with the new bone formation at the distraction site (Fig. 13).

Amputation Surgery

Ultrasonography can be used for finding the causes of limb stump pain after amputation surgery. Postoperative complications causing stump pain include infections, neuromas, venous thrombosis, popliteal artery aneurysms, or phantom limb pain. Ultrasonography can reveal an inflammation of the stump as well as fluid collection. Postoperative fluid collections may appear as anechoic lesions with posterior enhancement. After amputation surgery, development of a neuroma at the severed end of a major nerve is a concern. It is a tumor-like proliferation of regenerated nerve axons and is usually seen 1-12 months after amputation surgery. The pain associated with a neuroma is often difficult to distinguish from other types of stump pain. Ultrasonography is useful for the confirmation and location of a painful neuroma [21]. Its findings include a well-defined hypoechoic mass with continuity between the neuroma and a peripheral nerve (Fig. 14). Ultrasonography is effective in assessing whether the symptoms originate from the neuroma by compressing the mass with the transducer [22]. Vascular complications such as venous thrombosis and popliteal artery aneurysms can also be diagnosed by using ultrasonography along with color Doppler imaging.


Ultrasonography of the postoperative musculoskeletal system plays an important role in the accurate diagnosis of abnormal lesions in the bone and soft tissues. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is particularly helpful for the evaluation of soft tissues around the metal hardware, postoperative tendons, guidance for interventional procedures and aspiration of the joint fluid, assessment of recurrent or residual soft tissue tumors and bone unions, and identification of the causes of limb stump pain after amputation surgery. Ultrasonography is a fast and reliable method with no harmful irradiation for the evaluation of postoperative musculoskeletal complications. In particular, it is not affected by the excessive metal artifacts that appear on CT or MRI.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


1. Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal sonography and MR imaging: a role for both imaging methods. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37:713–735.
crossref pmid
2. Jacobson JA, Lax MJ. Musculoskeletal sonography of the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:67–77.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Guillin R, Botchu R, Bianchi S. Sonography of orthopedic hardware impingement of the extremities. J Ultrasound Med 2012;31:1457–1463.
crossref pmid
4. Sofka CM, Adler RS. Original report. Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1117–1120.
crossref pmid
5. van Holsbeeck MT, Eyler WR, Sherman LS, Lombardi TJ, Mezger E, Verner JJ, et al. Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:381–384.
crossref pmid
6. Craig JG. Ultrasound of the postoperative hip. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013;17:49–55.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Miller TT. Sonography of joint replacements. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2006;10:79–85.
crossref pmid pdf
8. Westhoff B, Wild A, Werner A, Schneider T, Kahl V, Krauspe R. The value of ultrasound after shoulder arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:695–701.
crossref pmid
9. Mack LA, Nyberg DA, Matsen FR 3rd, Kilcoyne RF, Harvey D. Sonography of the postoperative shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1089–1093.
crossref pmid
10. Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. Sonography of the postoperative rotator cuff. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:561–564.
crossref pmid
11. Shih KS, Huang YP, Wang TG, Wu CS, Jiang CC. Sonographic appearance of surgically repaired Achilles tendons. Taiwan J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;36:23–30.
12. Rupp S, Tempelhof S, Fritsch E. Ultrasound of the Achilles tendon after surgical repair: morphology and function. Br J Radiol 1995;68:454–458.
crossref pmid
13. Adler RS. Postoperative rotator cuff. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2013;17:12–19.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Movin T, Gad A, Reinholt Fp, Rolf C. Tendon pathology in longstanding achillodynia. Biopsy findings in 40 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:170–175.
crossref pmid
15. Pino G, Conzi GF, Murolo C, Schenone F, Magliani L, Imperiale A, et al. Sonographic evaluation of local recurrences of soft tissue sarcomas. J Ultrasound Med 1993;12:23–26.
crossref pmid
16. Arya S, Nagarkatti DG, Dudhat SB, Nadkarni KS, Joshi MS, Shinde SR. Soft tissue sarcomas: ultrasonographic evaluation of local recurrences. Clin Radiol 2000;55:193–197.
crossref pmid
17. Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI: which do I choose? Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2005;9:135–149.
crossref pmid pdf
18. Choi H, Varma DG, Fornage BD, Kim EE, Johnston DA. Softtissue sarcoma: MR imaging vs sonography for detection of local recurrence after surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:353–358.
crossref pmid
19. Craig JG, Jacobson JA, Moed BR. Ultrasound of fracture and bone healing. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37:737–751.
crossref pmid
20. Young JW, Kostrubiak IS, Resnik CS, Paley D. Sonographic evaluation of bone production at the distraction site in Ilizarov limb-lengthening procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:125–128.
crossref pmid
21. Provost N, Bonaldi VM, Sarazin L, Cho KH, Chhem RK. Amputation stump neuroma: ultrasound features. J Clin Ultrasound 1997;25:85–89.
crossref pmid
22. Ernberg LA, Adler RS, Lane J. Ultrasound in the detection and treatment of a painful stump neuroma. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32:306–309.
crossref pmid

A 32-year-old woman with a postoperative infection after intramedullary nailing.

A. Oblique radiograph shows suspicious cortical lucency along the medial aspect of the distal tibia. B. Longitudinal sonogram at the distal tibia shows subperiosteal anechoic abscesses (arrows) with a hyperechoic nail and screw. C. Postcontrast computed tomography shows irregularly shaped, non-enhancing hypodense soft tissue lesions (arrows) just medial to the tibia with subcutaneous edema. The abscess was surgically confirmed.
Fig. 1.

A 66-year-old woman with a previous comminuted fracture of the elbow treated with surgical pins.

A, B. Postoperative sonogram (A) shows a large elongated hypoechoic lesion (arrowheads) adjacent to the distal humerus with a hyperechoic pin (arrow) and a reverberation artifact, suggesting a hematoma due to the orthopedic K-wire (arrow) noted on the radiograph (B). The blood was surgically drained.
Fig. 2.

A 74-year-old woman with an infection 10 months after hemiarthroplasty.

A. The anterior-posterior radiograph shows the hemiarthroplasty of the left hip with soft tissue swelling. B. Sonogram of the proximal femur shows a subperiosteal hypoechoic lesion and an anechoic abscess containing debris (arrows).
Fig. 3.

A 72-year-old man with pain in the distal thigh after internal fixation.

A. The anterior-posterior radiograph shows internal fixation along the left femur and soft tissue swelling of the distal thigh. B. Sonogram of the distal thigh shows hyperechoic screws (arrows) of the distal femur and an adjacent irregular anechoic lesion with a thick wall, representing the abscess. C. The color Doppler sonogram shows a perilesionally increased vascular flow. Staphylococcus aureus grew on the culture plate.
Fig. 4.

A 69-year-old man with left buttock pain after total hip arthroplasty.

A. The anterior-posterior radiograph shows total hip arthoplasty with no definite abnormality. B. Magnetic resonance image shows poor delineation of structures due to the artifact. C. Sonogram shows anechoic fluid collection (arrows) just posterior to ischial tuberosity (arrowheads), suggesting ischio-gluteal bursitis. D. Ultrasound-guided steroid injection (arrows) into the bursa was performed.
Fig. 5.

A 54-year-old man with a supraspinatus tendon 6 months after repair.

Sonogram shows heterogeneous echo texture in the repaired tendon. Further, surface irregularity and small curvilinear echogenicity (arrows) along the anchor of the greater tuberosity with the suture material (arrowheads) within the tendon were noted.
Fig. 6.

A 51-year-old woman with a supraspinatus tendon 6 months after repair.

Sonogram shows a normal fibrillar pattern of the repaired tendon (arrowheads) and an anchor with a reverberation artifact (arrows).
Fig. 7.

A 51-year-old man with a supraspinatus tendon 6 months after repair.

Sonogram shows a heterogeneous echogenicity without a fibrillar pattern along the repaired tendon and a small focal low echoic area (arrowhead) representing the granulation tissue. Peribursal thickening is also seen (arrows). The patient exhibited no shoulder symptoms after tendon repair.
Fig. 8.

A 73-year-old man with a recurrent tear of the repaired tendon.

Sonogram shows a large irregular defect with anechoic fluid collection (arrowheads) in the repaired tendon, and broken suture (arrow).
Fig. 9.

A 63-year-old man with a massive retear of the repaired tendon.

A. Sonogram shows the absence of the repaired tendon with extensive anechoic fluid collection (arrows). B. The corresponding T2-weighted magnetic resonance image shows the absence of the repaired tendon with hyperintense fluid collection (arrowheads).
Fig. 10.

A 37-year-old man with a retear of the Achilles tendon 4 months after repair.

A. Sonogram shows an irregular anechoic lesion (arrowheads) in the markedly thickened repaired tendon and the displaced suture material (arrow). B. The color Doppler sonogram shows an increased vascular flow along the repaired tendon with marked thickening.
Fig. 11.

A 45-year-old man with a postoperative mass palpated in the area of surgery after resection.

Sonogram shows anechoic fluid collection along the muscle fascia, suggesting a seroma.
Fig. 12.

A 52-year-old man with bone lengthening following the Ilizarov procedure.

A. The anterior-posterior radiograph shows multiple bone defects with the Ilizarov external fixator. B. Sonogram shows an anechoic fluid lesion in the osteotomy defect. C. The blood was aspirated under ultrasound-guidance, indicating a hematoma. D. Ultrasonography conducted 2 weeks after aspiration showed considerable regression of the hematoma from 1.8 cm to 0.8 cm.
Fig. 13.

A 47-year-old man with tingling pain in the amputation stump.

A. The anterior-posterior radiograph shows the status of the amputation below the knee. B. Sonogram shows a hypoechoic mass (arrow) in continuity with the peroneal nerve (arrowheads). A neuroma was confirmed by surgical resection.
Fig. 14.
Web of Science
Editorial Office
A-304 Mapo Trapalace, 53 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04158, Korea
TEL : +82-2-763-5627   FAX : +82-2-763-6909   E-mail :
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Zoom in Close layer