Erratum: Thrombus stiffness as an independent predictor of endovascular treatment success in hemodialysis fistulas: a study using ultrasound elastography

Article information

Ultrasonography. 2025;44(3):243-243
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24175.ER
1Department of Radiology, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
2Department of Nephrology, Mersin City Training and Research Hospital, Mersin, Turkey
3Department of Radiology, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine Research and Application Hospital, Mersin, Turkey

Ultrasonography 2025;44:153-159

https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.24175

In the article entitled "Thrombus stiffness as an independent predictor of endovascular treatment success in hemodialysis fistulas: a study using ultrasound elastography" [Ultrasonography 2025;44:153-159] by Zirek et al., the number of E1 and E2 in the bottom-left box of Fig.1A were inadvertently reversed. This error has been corrected.

Fig. 1.

Strain elastography (A) and elastography map (B) images of a patient with hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula dysfunction due to thrombosis.

The surrounding soft tissue is identified as the reference point and marked with the E1 region of interest (ROI) circle. The thrombus within the vascular lumen was identified with the E2 ROI circle, and the ratio to the reference tissue (E1) was calculated by the device using the formula strain ratio=E2/E1. In this shared case, the strain ratio was calculated as 1.7, and the endovascular treatment performed was unsuccessful.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Strain elastography (A) and elastography map (B) images of a patient with hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula dysfunction due to thrombosis.

The surrounding soft tissue is identified as the reference point and marked with the E1 region of interest (ROI) circle. The thrombus within the vascular lumen was identified with the E2 ROI circle, and the ratio to the reference tissue (E1) was calculated by the device using the formula strain ratio=E2/E1. In this shared case, the strain ratio was calculated as 1.7, and the endovascular treatment performed was unsuccessful.