Association of triglyceride-driven residual atherosclerotic risk with carotid stiffening assessed using ultrafast ultrasound imaging in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia

Article information

Ultrasonography. 2026;45(3):298-310
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 March 17
doi : https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.26047
1Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
2Department of Ultrasound, Jiangsu Province Geriatric Hospital, Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
3Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
4Center of Good Clinical Practice, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
5Department of Geriatrics, Jiangsu Province Geriatric Hospital, Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence to: Weiming Ge, MD, Department of Geriatrics, Jiangsu Province Geriatric Hospital, Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 65# Jiangsu Road, Nanjing 210009, China Tel, Fax. +86-25-8331-1761 E-mail: 1270332953@qq.com
Hui Huang, MD, Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, 155# Hanzhong Road, Nanjing 210029, China Tel, Fax. +86-25-8661-7141 E-mail: szcrhh007@vip.163.com

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 2026 January 24; Revised 2026 March 13; Accepted 2026 March 16.

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with hypertriglyceridemia retain residual atherosclerotic risk despite achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets. This study investigated the association of this risk with carotid stiffening assessed by ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV).

Methods

This study included 518 participants who underwent simultaneous ufPWV and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) measurements. Participants were stratified by triglyceride (TG) level into TG-optimal, TG-normal, and TG-high groups. Pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole and at the end of systole (PWV-ES) were measured using ufPWV. Participants were also categorized by Framingham risk score (FRS) into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk subgroups and by LDL-C level into normal and high subgroups. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the potential predictive role of increased PWV-ES.

Results

In the total population and the normal LDL-C subgroup, both the TG-high and TG-normal groups had higher PWV-ES and cIMT values than the TG-optimal group (all P<0.05). Among participants with normal cIMT (<0.050 cm), PWV-ES effectively differentiated the TG-optimal and TG-high groups (P<0.001), but this difference was not observed when cIMT was ≥0.050 cm. Similarly, PWV-ES differentiated TG groups within the low-risk FRS subgroup (all P<0.01), but not within the intermediate- or high-risk subgroups. Logistic regression showed that increased PWV-ES was independently associated with high TG levels in both the normal LDL-C subgroup (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; P=0.006) and the high LDL-C subgroup (OR, 1.57; P=0.023) after adjustment for LDL-C alone.

Conclusion

ufPWV-quantified carotid stiffness is associated with elevated TG-driven residual atherosclerotic risk, independent of LDL-C.

Graphical abstract

Introduction

Dyslipidemia, particularly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is an independent risk factor with a key role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (AS) [1,2]. Mendelian randomization studies have established the critical role of LDL-C in atherosclerotic plaque formation and related cardiovascular events [3]. Extensive evidence from clinical studies [4] and trials [5] has also demonstrated that lowering LDL-C significantly reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, the Progression of Early Subclinical Atherosclerosis (PESA) study [6] revealed that approximately 50% of participants had atherosclerotic plaques despite having LDL-C levels within the normal range. In addition, multiple large randomized controlled trials have shown that achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C targets reduces only one-third of cardiovascular events, leaving two-thirds of the risk unaddressed—a phenomenon termed cardiovascular residual risk [79]. Accordingly, the assessment of residual cardiovascular risk has become a focus of current research.

With increasingly stringent LDL-C control in clinical practice, a substantial proportion of patients with dyslipidemia now present with hypertriglyceridemia. Hypertriglyceridemia, characterized by elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRLs), is considered a potential major contributor to residual atherosclerotic risk. The Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial confirmed that patients with controlled LDL-C but elevated triglyceride (TG) levels retain substantial cardiovascular risk and that targeted TG-lowering therapy is associated with a 25% risk reduction [10]. The PESA study further showed that hypertriglyceridemia is independently associated with subclinical AS even in low-risk individuals with normal LDL-C levels, reinforcing the contribution of TG to residual atherosclerotic burden [11]. However, no established method is currently available for the visual and quantitative assessment of residual atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), obtained by noninvasive ultrasound, is currently recognized as a morphological marker of early AS [12] and is closely associated with ASCVD [13]. However, a large meta-analysis (n=100,667) found that cIMT has limited value for predicting cardiovascular events in the general population [14]. Moreover, the use of cIMT is constrained by limitations such as inter-operator variability, lack of standardization, and insufficient sensitivity for detecting early AS, particularly in low-risk populations [15,16]. Another study [17] indicated that carotid stiffening can occur even in individuals with normal cIMT, suggesting that functional changes in carotid stiffness may precede measurable cIMT thickening. Therefore, new approaches are necessary to assess the early progression of residual atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, including methods that evaluate arterial stiffening.

Ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV) is a novel, convenient, noninvasive, real-time ultrasound imaging technique for measuring pulse wave velocity (PWV), with good accuracy and reproducibility in the assessment of arterial stiffness [17,18]. Unlike traditional PWV methods, ufPWV uses an ultra-high frame rate (>2,000 frames/s) to track local motion of the common carotid artery (CCA) wall in real time and to accurately measure PWV conduction in the arterial wall, thereby avoiding the large errors introduced by estimated distance and timing in conventional methods [17,19,20]. Previous studies have shown that ufPWV can quantitatively assess the presence and progression of AS in patients with early cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension [19], chronic kidney disease [20], and diabetes [21]. According to Zhu et al. [17], ufPWV can also be used to assess AS risk in patients without such risk factors, even when LDL-C is controlled at an optimal level. Therefore, it is theoretically feasible that ufPWV could be used to evaluate residual AS risk in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia whose LDL-C levels are normal or even optimal.

This study aimed to assess the association between ufPWV-quantified carotid stiffening and residual atherosclerotic risk driven by elevated TG levels in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia, with the goal of informing timely intervention for AS progression and potentially reducing ASCVD incidence.

Materials and Methods

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (2019NL-128-02). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Study Cohort

This retrospective study initially enrolled 982 participants from the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine who underwent ufPWV between January 2019 and December 2024. All participants also underwent carotid ultrasound examinations and laboratory testing, and their clinical data were collected. The following laboratory parameters were obtained after at least 8 hours of fasting: TG, total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and serum creatinine (SCr).

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (n=12); (2) cancer, kidney dysfunction, liver disease, blood disease, or any other condition that could affect life expectancy (n=36); (3) pregnancy or lactation (n=2); (4) incomplete clinical, laboratory, or imaging data (n=235); and (5) invalid ufPWV measurements (n=179; details are provided in the “Measurements of cIMT and ufPWV” section). After these criteria were applied, 518 participants remained and were divided into three groups according to the Fourth Adult Treatment Panel guidelines for fasting serum TG [22]: TG-high (≥150 mg/dL [1.69 mmol/L], n=150), TG-normal (100–149 mg/dL [1.13–1.68 mmol/L], n=146), and TG-optimal (<100 mg/dL [1.12 mmol/L], n=222) (Fig. 1). To investigate the association between residual atherosclerotic risk and carotid stiffness in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia and explore whether LDL-C influences this association, participants (n=518) were further divided into two subgroups: high LDL-C (≥3.4 mmol/L, n=97) and normal LDL-C (<3.4 mmol/L, n=421). In accordance with previous research [17], cIMT ≥0.050 cm and PWV at the end of systole (PWV-ES) ≥7.0 m/s were used as morphological and biomechanical indicators, respectively, of carotid AS. The prevalence of AS in the study population was then calculated. To evaluate the trend in carotid stiffness across increasing TG levels, participants were additionally categorized into six subgroups at 50 mg/dL intervals: <50 mg/dL (<0.57 mmol/L), 50–99 mg/dL (0.57–1.12 mmol/L), 100–149 mg/dL (1.13–1.68 mmol/L), 150–199 mg/dL (1.69–2.25 mmol/L), 200–249 mg/dL (2.26–2.81 mmol/L), and ≥250 mg/dL (≥2.82 mmol/L). These cutoffs were selected to yield equally spaced intervals while maintaining adequate sample sizes within each subgroup.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of study cohort selection.

This retrospective study enrolled 982 participants who underwent clinical and laboratory examinations, as well as concurrent ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV) and carotid intima-media thickness measurements. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 518 participants with available data were included in the final analysis. These participants were then divided into three groups according to triglyceride (TG) level: TG-optimal (n=222), TG-normal (n=146), and TG-high (n=150).

Framingham Risk Score Algorithm and Subgroups

This study used the Framingham risk score (FRS) algorithm, derived from D'Agostino et al. [23], to estimate cardiovascular risk for each participant by calculating a cumulative score based on age, sex, systolic blood pressure (SBP), HDL-C and TC levels, smoking status, and diabetes. SBP was determined as the mean of three consecutive measurements obtained from either arm using a validated digital sphygmomanometer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Smoking status and diabetes were defined according to the 2021 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice [24]. Laboratory parameters, including HDL-C and TC, were measured in venous blood samples collected after an overnight fast of at least 8 hours. Based on the FRS algorithm, participants (n=518) were categorized into three FRS subgroups: low risk (<10%, n=376), intermediate risk (10%–20%, n=88), and high risk (>20%, n=54).

Measurements of cIMT and ufPWV

cIMT and ufPWV were measured using an ultrasonic diagnostic system (Supersonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France) equipped with a linear array probe (SL10-2). Participants were examined in the supine resting position with the neck fully exposed. The longitudinal section was adjusted to clearly visualize the intima-media structure of the posterior wall of the distal CCA, 1.0 to 1.5 cm proximal to the bifurcation. cIMT was quantified using automated cIMT measurement software (Aixplorer, Supersonic Imagine), which reduced the substantial bias associated with manual cIMT measurement [17,25]. A white sampling frame (1 cm wide) was placed within the region of interest (ROI), and the cIMT was delineated in real time by two white dotted lines within the frame. The system then automatically measured the mean cIMT of the traced segment. A cIMT value was considered valid when the quality control index, Fit, exceeded 80% (Fig. 2A, C). For each side of the CCA, three repeated measurements were obtained, and the mean value was used as the cIMT for that side. Finally, the average of the left and right cIMT values was used as the participant’s final cIMT.

Fig. 2.

Protocol for measuring carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) using the Aixplorer automatic cIMT measurement system and carotid stiffness using ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV).

A. cIMT was measured using the Aixplorer automatic cIMT measurement system. The white region of interest (ROI) box was placed on the posterior wall of the common carotid artery (CCA) near the bulb, while two white dashed lines automatically traced the carotid intima-media structure. The mean cIMT within the ROI was obtained with a Fit value of 98%. B. Pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole (PWV-BS) and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) were measured using ufPWV. The yellow ROI box covered the anterior and posterior walls of the main CCA, and the red line tracked movement of the anterior and posterior walls in real time. PWV-BS and PWV-ES were considered valid when Δ± was ≤1.0 m/s. C, D. Magnified views of the cIMT and ufPWV measurement regions are shown, respectively. LCCA, left common carotid artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery.

The probe was then moved to a straight segment of the CCA in a longitudinal plane that clearly displayed both the anterior and posterior walls. Each participant was asked to hold their breath for 5 seconds while the probe remained motionless and the “PWV” mode was activated. After image acquisition and processing, a yellow sampling frame (3×3 cm) was positioned over the CCA so that the envelopes of the anterior and posterior walls could be automatically traced by two red lines. The system then automatically recorded the PWV parameters, including PWV at the beginning of systole (PWV-BS) and PWV-ES. A quality control index of Δ±≤1.0 m/s was considered indicative of a valid measurement (Fig. 2B, D). Measurements were considered invalid under the following conditions: (1) Δ±>1.0 m/s; (2) failure to acquire PWV-BS and/or PWV-ES; and (3) incorrect ROI placement [17,25]. The CCA on each side was measured three times, and the average value was calculated. The mean of the bilateral CCA values was used as the final PWV-BS and PWV-ES for each participant.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The normality of continuous variables was assessed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Participant characteristics are presented as number (%) for categorical variables and as mean±standard deviation or median (first quartile, third quartile) for normally and non-normally distributed continuous variables, respectively. For comparisons among the three TG groups, one-way analysis of variance was used for normally distributed continuous variables, the Kruskal-Wallis H test for non-normally distributed continuous variables, and the chi-square test for categorical variables. Pairwise comparisons among the three TG groups within the LDL-C, cIMT, and FRS subgroups were performed using the least significant difference test. Bar graphs were used to illustrate PWV-ES and cIMT levels across TG groups and FRS subgroups. Trends in PWV-ES with increasing TG levels in the overall population and LDL-C subgroups were illustrated using bar and line graphs. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to evaluate associations between major cardiovascular risk factors and carotid ultrasound parameters. To evaluate the association between increased carotid stiffness and residual atherosclerotic risk in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Candidate adjustment variables in the multivariable models were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), FBG, SCr, and LDL-C, all of which are major cardiovascular risk factors. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Clinical and Ultrasound Characteristics of Study Participants

A total of 518 participants (47.3% men; mean age, 50.78 years; mean BMI, 23.71 kg/m2) were included and categorized into the TG-optimal, TG-normal, and TG-high groups (Table 1). Clinical and ultrasound characteristics differed significantly among the three groups (all P<0.05), except for PWV-BS (P=0.231). Compared with the TG-optimal group, the TG-normal and TG-high groups had significantly higher age, proportion of men, BMI, SBP, DBP, FRS, TG, TC, LDL-C, FBG, SCr, cIMT, and PWV-ES, as well as lower HDL-C levels (all P<0.05) (Table 1).

Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of study participants grouped by TG level

cIMT and Carotid Stiffening across TG Groups in the Total Population and LDL-C Subgroups

In the total population, both the TG-high and TG-normal groups had significantly higher cIMT values than the TG-optimal group (all P<0.001) (Fig. 3A), as well as higher PWV-ES values (P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively) (Fig. 3C). A similar pattern was observed in the normal LDL-C subgroup for both cIMT (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively) (Fig. 3D) and PWV-ES (P<0.01 and P<0.05, respectively) (Fig. 3F). In contrast, within the high LDL-C subgroup, only PWV-ES was significantly higher in the TG-high group than in the TG-optimal group (P=0.017) (Fig. 3I), whereas cIMT did not differ significantly among the TG groups (all P>0.05) (Fig. 3G). PWV-BS did not differ significantly among the three TG groups in either the total population or the LDL-C subgroups (all P>0.05) (Fig. 3B, E, H). In the finer TG stratification, PWV-ES showed an overall increasing trend with rising TG levels, despite a slight decline at the highest range, in both the total population and the LDL-C subgroups (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Pairwise comparisons of ultrasound parameters among triglyceride (TG) groups in the total population and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subgroups.

Boxplots show pairwise comparisons of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole (PWV-BS), and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) among TG groups in the total population (A–C), the normal LDL-C subgroup (D–F), and the high LDL-C subgroup (G–I). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Fig. 4.

Bar and line graphs of pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) across finer triglyceride (TG) categories in the total population and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subgroups.

Bar graphs of PWV-ES by finer TG category are shown for the total population (A), the normal LDL-C subgroup (C), and the high LDL-C subgroup (E); all comparisons were made against TG <0.57 mmol/L. ***P<0.001. Line graphs of PWV-ES by finer TG category are shown for the total population (B), the normal LDL-C subgroup (D), and the high LDL-C subgroup (F).

Carotid Stiffening across cIMT and FRS Subgroups

In the TG-optimal, TG-normal, and TG-high groups, the proportions of participants with cIMT ≥0.050 cm were 59.0%, 82.2%, and 79.3%, respectively (Fig. 5A). The proportions with PWV-ES ≥7.0 m/s increased progressively across these groups, reaching 56.3%, 73.9%, and 77.3%, respectively (Fig. 5C). For both cIMT and PWV-ES, the proportions of intermediate-risk (FRS 10%–20%) and high-risk (FRS >20%) individuals increased with increasing TG levels (Fig. 5B, D). Among participants with cIMT <0.050 cm, PWV-ES differed significantly between the TG-optimal and TG-high groups (P<0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed among the three TG groups when cIMT was ≥0.050 cm (all P>0.05) (Fig. 5E). Similarly, within the low-risk subgroup, PWV-ES differed significantly between the TG-optimal and TG-normal groups (P=0.005) and between the TG-optimal and TG-high groups (P<0.001). No significant differences were observed among the TG groups in the intermediate- or high-risk subgroups (all P>0.05) (Fig. 5F).

Fig. 5.

Carotid stiffening across carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and Framingham risk score (FRS) subgroups.

The proportions of participants with cIMT ≥0.050 cm (A) and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) ≥7.0 m/s (C) are shown across triglyceride (TG) groups. The proportions of participants with cIMT ≥0.050 cm (B) and PWV-ES ≥7.0 m/s (D) are also shown across TG groups stratified by FRS category. Boxplots show pairwise comparisons of PWV-ES among TG groups within the cIMT (E) and FRS (F) subgroups. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Correlations between cIMT, ufPWV Indices, and Major Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Total Population

PWV-ES was significantly correlated with age (r=0.545, P<0.001), and this correlation was stronger than that observed for cIMT (r=0.479, P<0.001). PWV-ES was also weakly associated with BMI (r=0.177), SBP (r=0.300), DBP (r=0.175), TG (r=0.158), HDL-C (r=−0.130), FBG (r=0.087), and SCr (r=0.131) (all P<0.05). cIMT showed similarly weak correlations with these variables (r=0.137–0.359, all P<0.05). In contrast, PWV-BS was weakly correlated only with age (r=0.285, P<0.001) and SCr (r=0.156, P<0.001) (Table 2).

Correlations of major cardiovascular risk factors with cIMT, PWV-BS, and PWV-ES in the total population

Association between Carotid Stiffening and TG-Driven Residual Atherosclerotic Risk

Logistic regression analysis showed that increased carotid stiffness was associated with high TG levels in the high LDL-C subgroup (OR, 1.56; P=0.024). This association remained significant after adjustment for LDL-C alone (OR for PWV-ES, 1.57; P=0.023) and after further adjustment for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, FBG, and SCr (OR for PWV-ES, 1.81; P=0.048). In the normal LDL-C subgroup, increased carotid stiffness was also associated with high TG levels (OR, 1.22; P=0.005) and remained significant after adjustment for LDL-C alone (OR for PWV-ES, 1.21; P=0.006), but not after further adjustment for age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, FBG, and SCr (OR for PWV-ES, 1.03; P=0.744) (Table 3).

Odds ratios of PWV-ES among TG groups in the total population and LDL-C subgroups

Discussion

Using ufPWV, this study showed that increased carotid stiffness was associated with elevated TG levels even in individuals with normal LDL-C levels, indicating persistent residual atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. In addition, PWV-ES, a technical parameter derived from ufPWV, differentiated atherosclerotic risk across TG strata in both the cIMT <0.050 cm subgroup and the low-risk FRS subgroup, suggesting potential value for early risk detection. These findings further suggest that ufPWV-guided TG-lowering strategies may help reduce residual atherosclerotic risk and enable earlier preventive intervention in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

The Framingham Heart Study, with 12 years of follow-up, demonstrated a robust positive association between TG levels and atherosclerotic risk after multivariable adjustment [26]. A meta-analysis of 29 Western prospective studies (n=262,525) revealed that each 1 mmol/L increase in TG levels corresponded to an approximately 30% increase in coronary heart disease risk [27]. In the present study, both PWV-ES and cIMT were significantly higher in the TG-high and TG-normal groups than in the TG-optimal group, indicating greater atherosclerotic risk at higher TG levels. This pattern persisted even among participants with normal LDL-C levels, supporting the presence of residual atherosclerotic risk in hypertriglyceridemia. Numerous genetic and epidemiological studies have identified TG and TGRLs as major contributors to residual ASCVD risk [28]. Mechanistically, TGRL metabolism generates atherogenic remnant particles that readily penetrate the arterial intima and accelerate foam cell formation, while elevated TG levels also promote endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory responses, and coagulation activation [2931]. Together, these TG-mediated processes contribute to increased arterial stiffness and greater residual atherosclerotic risk.

This study is also distinctive in that it identified a significant association between elevated TG levels and increased carotid stiffness, measured using ufPWV rather than the previously used brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV). This association persisted independently of LDL-C concentration. Kawasoe et al. [32] studied a Japanese general population with low LDL-C levels (≤119 mg/dL) and found that high TG levels were independently associated with increased carotid stiffness. Similarly, a Chinese study evaluating the associations of non–HDL-C, TG, and the TC/HDL-C ratio with arterial stiffness showed that TG levels were consistently associated with baPWV, independent of LDL-C levels [33]. Mechanistically, a large UK Biobank cohort study (>502,000 UK residents) [34] estimated that TGRLs and their remnants confer an approximately fourfold higher atherogenic risk than LDL-C particles, which may partly explain the robust association between TG levels and arterial stiffening independent of LDL-C concentrations. However, these atherogenic processes are closely intertwined with traditional cardiovascular risk factors, creating a synergistic environment in which TG-mediated arterial stiffening cannot be mechanistically separated from these factors. Accordingly, the observed association was slightly attenuated after comprehensive adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including age, sex, BMI, SBP, DBP, FBG, and SCr. These model-dependent findings underscore the complexity of the relationship between TG and carotid stiffness and its susceptibility to multifactorial influences.

Previous studies have shown a significant positive correlation between TG levels and cIMT, particularly in patients with type 2 diabetes [35] and obesity [36]. The present results also demonstrated that cIMT was correlated with TG (r=0.123). Both cIMT, which reflects arterial wall structure, and PWV-ES, which reflects arterial stiffening, represent key indicators of AS and cardiovascular risk. Zhu et al. [17] reported that carotid stiffening may already be present even when the morphological carotid index remains within the normal range (cIMT <0.050 cm). This finding suggests a pathophysiological sequence in which functional stiffening precedes structural remodeling. Consistent with this interpretation, the present results showed that among participants with normal cIMT, PWV-ES differentiated between the TG-high and TG-optimal groups, with significantly higher values in the former. This discriminatory ability disappeared once structural thickening occurred (cIMT ≥0.050 cm), as no significant differences were observed among the three TG groups. These findings suggest that PWV-ES may enable the accurate quantitative assessment of TG-related atherosclerotic risk at an early stage, before morphological cIMT thickening becomes detectable.

Although both PWV-BS and PWV-ES are derived from the same ufPWV acquisition, only PWV-ES was significantly associated with TG-driven residual risk. This discrepancy may stem from differences in the hemodynamic phases captured by the two parameters: PWV-BS reflects velocity at the onset of systole and thus the artery’s immediate elastic response, whereas PWV-ES reflects end-systolic velocity and therefore represents the cumulative arterial strain during systole [17,25]. In early atherogenesis, functional stiffening typically emerges first during late systole as a result of endothelial dysfunction, altered smooth muscle tone, and extracellular matrix remodeling, often before structural thickening becomes detectable [19,21]. Previous ufPWV studies have similarly shown that PWV-ES is more sensitive than PWV-BS for detecting subclinical arterial stiffening in populations with hypertension [19], diabetes [21], and even no overt risk factors [17]. Accordingly, the subtle biomechanical effects of elevated TG may be better captured by PWV-ES. In contrast, PWV-BS may require more advanced vascular remodeling before it becomes abnormal, which could explain its lack of discriminatory value among TG groups. These findings support PWV-ES as the more informative ufPWV parameter for quantifying early TG-related arterial stiffening and residual atherosclerotic risk.

The FRS remains a cornerstone of cardiovascular risk assessment and is widely used in clinical practice. Although TG is not directly included in the FRS calculation, it may complement FRS-based risk assessment, especially in patients with metabolic syndrome [37]. Previous research has reported a positive correlation between TG concentration and FRS [38]. The present results support a similar relationship, showing progressive increases in the proportions of intermediate-risk and high-risk FRS categories as TG levels increased. A recent study [39] indicated that PWV-ES was significantly associated with FRS-estimated risk, especially in the low-risk FRS group (r=0.517), suggesting that PWV-ES may be useful for cardiovascular risk assessment in low-risk populations. Similarly, in the present study, PWV-ES accurately differentiated carotid stiffness across TG groups within the low-risk FRS subgroup. However, PWV-ES did not clearly distinguish these differences in the intermediate- or high-risk FRS subgroups. These observations support consideration of PWV-ES assessment in low-risk individuals with borderline or elevated TG levels to improve atherosclerotic risk stratification and facilitate timely preventive intervention.

This study has several limitations. First, because this was a retrospective observational study, the association between TG and carotid stiffness should not be interpreted as causal. Second, multiple subgroup comparisons were performed using the least significant difference test without adjustment for multiple testing. Although this approach is sensitive for exploratory analyses, the findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in future studies. Third, although some individuals had normal LDL-C levels at the time of assessment, prior long-term exposure to elevated LDL-C may have caused irreversible or only partially reversible vascular structural changes that continued to elevate PWV. Therefore, increased PWV in individuals with normal LDL-C and TG levels may not be attributable solely to TG-driven residual atherosclerotic risk, which could have introduced bias into the results. Fourth, although fasting TG levels were measured after an overnight fast of at least 8 hours according to standard protocols, recent evidence suggests that non-fasting TG measurements may provide superior cardiovascular risk prediction [40]. Finally, this was a single-center study with a limited sample size, which may restrict the generalizability of the findings. Large-scale, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

Elevated carotid stiffness quantified by ufPWV was significantly associated with elevated TG levels in individuals with hypertriglyceridemia, independent of LDL-C, suggesting that PWV-ES, a ufPWV-derived parameter, may be a promising tool for the early quantitative assessment of residual atherosclerotic risk.

Notes

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Dai P, Zhu Z. Data acquisition: Dai P, Zhu Z, Gao H, Ma X, Wang Y, Shen B, Luan Y. Data analysis or interpretation: Dai P, Zhu Z. Drafting of the manuscript: Dai P, Zhu Z, Huang H. Critical revision of the manuscript: Jiang X, Zou C, Huang H, Ge W. Approval of the final version of the manuscript: all authors.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Project on Health Care for Cadres in Jiangsu Province (grant numbers BJ23007 and BJ25010) and the Research Project of Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine (grant numbers Y2019CX33 and Y2023CX29).

References

1. Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L, Hansson GK, Deanfield J, Bittencourt MS, et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019;5:56. 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z. 31420554.
2. Alloubani A, Nimer R, Samara R. Relationship between hyperlipidemia, cardiovascular disease and stroke: a systematic review. Curr Cardiol Rev 2021;17:e051121189015. 10.2174/18756557mteyfmziyw. 33305711.
3. Linsel-Nitschke P, Gotz A, Erdmann J, Braenne I, Braund P, Hengstenberg C, et al. Lifelong reduction of LDL-cholesterol related to a common variant in the LDL-receptor gene decreases the risk of coronary artery disease: a Mendelian Randomisation study. PLoS One 2008;3:e2986. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002986. 18714375.
4. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, Ray KK, Packard CJ, Bruckert E, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J 2017;38:2459–2472. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. 28444290.
5. Rosenson RS, Shaik A, Song W. New therapies for lowering triglyceride-rich lipoproteins: JACC focus seminar 3/4. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;78:1817–1830. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.051. 34711341.
6. Fernandez-Friera L, Fuster V, Lopez-Melgar B, Oliva B, Garcia-Ruiz JM, Mendiguren J, et al. Normal LDL-cholesterol levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in the absence of risk factors. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2979–2991. 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.024. 29241485.
7. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2010;376:1670–1681. 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61350-5. 21067804.
8. Zambon A. Residual cardiovascular risk in secondary prevention. Intern Emerg Med 2011;6 Suppl 1:61–68. 10.1007/s11739-011-0689-1. 22009614.
9. Dhindsa DS, Sandesara PB, Shapiro MD, Wong ND. The evolving understanding and approach to residual cardiovascular risk management. Front Cardiovasc Med 2020;7:88. 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00088. 32478100.
10. Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Ketchum SB, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction with icosapent ethyl for hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med 2019;380:11–22. 10.1056/nejmoa1812792. 30415628.
11. Raposeiras-Roubin S, Rossello X, Oliva B, Fernandez-Friera L, Mendiguren JM, Andres V, et al. Triglycerides and residual atherosclerotic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021;77:3031–3041. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.059. 34140107.
12. Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 2011;473:317–325. 10.1038/nature10146. 21593864.
13. Paraskevas KI, Sillesen HH, Rundek T, Mathiesen EB, Spence JD. Carotid intima-media thickness versus carotid plaque burden for predicting cardiovascular risk. Angiology 2020;71:108–111. 10.1177/0003319719878582. 31569951.
14. Willeit P, Tschiderer L, Allara E, Reuber K, Seekircher L, Gao L, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness progression as surrogate marker for cardiovascular risk: meta-analysis of 119 clinical trials involving 100 667 patients. Circulation 2020;142:621–642. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046361. 32546049.
15. Cobble M, Bale B. Carotid intima-media thickness: knowledge and application to everyday practice. Postgrad Med 2010;122:10–18. 10.3810/pgm.2010.01.2091. 20107284.
16. Lorenz MW, Gao L, Ziegelbauer K, Norata GD, Empana JP, Schmidtmann I, et al. Predictive value for cardiovascular events of common carotid intima media thickness and its rate of change in individuals at high cardiovascular risk: results from the PROG-IMT collaboration. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191172. 10.1371/journal.pone.0191172. 29649236.
17. Zhu Z, Chen L, Jiang X, Wu Y, Zou C, Luan Y, et al. Absent atherosclerotic risk factors are associated with carotid stiffening quantified with ultrafast ultrasound imaging. Eur Radiol 2021;31:3195–3206. 10.1007/s00330-020-07405-4. 33068187.
18. Pan F, Yu L, Luo J, Wu R, Xu M, Liang J, et al. Carotid artery stiffness assessment by Ultrafast ultrasound imaging: feasibility and potential influencing factors. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:2759–2767. 10.1002/jum.14630. 29672890.
19. Ma X, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Shen B, Jiang X, Liu W, et al. Quantifying carotid stiffness in a pre-hypertensive population with ultrafast ultrasound imaging. Ultrasonography 2023;42:89–99. 10.14366/usg.22039. 36588181.
20. Huang H, Zhu Z, Wang H, Ma X, Liu W, Wu Y, et al. Quantifying carotid stiffness in chronic kidney disease using ultrafast ultrasound imaging. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2024;14:75–85. 10.21037/qims-23-503. 38223093.
21. Pan F, Xu M, Yu L, Luo J, Li M, Liang J, et al. Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and carotid artery stiffness assessed by ultrafast ultrasound imaging in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Radiol 2019;111:34–40. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.12.016. 30691662.
22. Klempfner R, Erez A, Sagit B, Goldenberg I, Fisman E, Kopel E, et al. Elevated triglyceride level is independently associated with increased all-cause mortality in patients with established coronary heart disease: twenty-two-year follow-up of the bezafibrate infarction prevention study and registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2016;9:100–108. 26957517.
23. D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain M, Massaro JM, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008;117:743–753. 10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579. 18212285.
24. Visseren FL, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Back M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: developed by the Task Force for cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice with representatives of the European Society of Cardiology and 12 medical societies with the special contribution of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2022;75:429. 10.1016/j.rec.2022.04.003. 35525570.
25. Zhu Z, Chen L, Wang H, Liu F, Luan Y, Wu L, et al. Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: non-invasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity. Eur Radiol 2019;29:1507–1517. 10.1007/s00330-018-5705-7. 30187117.
26. Castelli WP, Garrison RJ, Wilson PW, Abbott RD, Kalousdian S, Kannel WB. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels: the Framingham study. JAMA 1986;256:2835–2838. 10.1001/jama.1986.03380200073024. 3773200.
27. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, Sigurdsson G, Wareham N, Bingham S, et al. Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Circulation 2007;115:450–458. 10.1161/circulationaha.106.637793. 17190864.
28. Ginsberg HN, Packard CJ, Chapman MJ, Boren J, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Averna M, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants: metabolic insights, role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and emerging therapeutic strategies-a consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J 2021;42:4791–4806. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab551. 34472586.
29. Sandesara PB, Virani SS, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. The forgotten lipids: triglycerides, remnant cholesterol, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Endocr Rev 2019;40:537–557. 10.1210/er.2018-00184. 30312399.
30. Miller YI, Choi S, Fang L, Tsimikas S. Lipoprotein modification and macrophage uptake: role of pathologic cholesterol transport in atherogenesis. Subcell Biochem 2010;51:229–251. 10.1007/978-90-481-8622-8_8. 20213546.
31. Shin HK, Kim YK, Kim KY, Lee JH, Hong KW. Remnant lipoprotein particles induce apoptosis in endothelial cells by NAD(P)H oxidase-mediated production of superoxide and cytokines via lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 activation: prevention by cilostazol. Circulation 2004;109:1022–1028. 10.1161/01.cir.0000117403.64398.53. 14967724.
32. Kawasoe S, Ide K, Usui T, Kubozono T, Yoshifuku S, Miyahara H, et al. Association of serum triglycerides with arterial stiffness in subjects with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Circ J 2018;82:3052–3057. 10.1253/circj.cj-18-0607. 30259879.
33. Wen J, Huang Y, Lu Y, Yuan H. Associations of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and the total cholesterol/HDL-c ratio with arterial stiffness independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a Chinese population. Hypertens Res 2019;42:1223–1230. 10.1038/s41440-019-0251-5. 30918334.
34. Bjornson E, Adiels M, Gummesson A, Taskinen M, Burgess S, Packard CJ, et al. Quantifying triglyceride-rich lipoprotein atherogenicity, associations with inflammation, and implications for risk assessment using non-HDL cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024;84:1328–1338. 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.07.034. 39322327.
35. Mashaba RG, Phoswa W, Maimela E, Lebelo S, Modjadji P, Mokgalaboni K. Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the status of carotid intima-media thickness and lipid profiles in type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ Open 2024;14:e087496. 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087496. 39521468.
36. Lin Y, Hsu Y, Tsai K, Kwon Y, Lin G. Insulin resistance indices and carotid intima-media thickness in physically fit adults: CHIEF atherosclerosis study. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2023;23:1442–1448. 10.2174/1871530323666230324104737. 36967464.
37. Jahangiry L, Farhangi MA, Rezaei F. Framingham risk score for estimation of 10-years of cardiovascular diseases risk in patients with metabolic syndrome. J Health Popul Nutr 2017;36:36. 10.1186/s41043-017-0114-0. 29132438.
38. Ito K, Yoshida H, Yanai H, Kurosawa H, Sato R, Manita D, et al. Relevance of intermediate-density lipoprotein cholesterol to Framingham risk score of coronary heart disease in middle-aged men with increased non-HDL cholesterol. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:3853–3858. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.023.
39. Zhu Z, Chen L, Shen B, Liu W, Zou C, Wang Y, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk stratification in apparently healthy population by using noninvasive ultrafast ultrasound imaging. Acad Radiol 2024;31:3944–3955. 10.1016/j.acra.2024.05.011. 38816317.
40. Harchaoui KE, Visser ME, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES, Dallinga-Thie GM. Triglycerides and cardiovascular risk. Curr Cardiol Rev 2009;5:216–222. 10.2174/157340309788970315. 20676280.

Article information Continued

Notes

Key points

Even in individuals with normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the triglyceride (TG)–high and TG-normal groups still have higher carotid stiffness than the TG-optimal group. There is a significant association between increased carotid stiffness and elevated TG levels independent of LDL-C, indicating the presence of residual atherosclerotic risk in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Pulse wave velocity at the end of systole can differentiate atherosclerosis (AS) risks resulting from varying TG levels in both the carotid intima-media thickness < 0.050 cm and low-risk Framingham risk score subgroups, suggesting potential application value in the early assessment of AS.

Fig. 1.

Flow diagram of study cohort selection.

This retrospective study enrolled 982 participants who underwent clinical and laboratory examinations, as well as concurrent ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV) and carotid intima-media thickness measurements. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 518 participants with available data were included in the final analysis. These participants were then divided into three groups according to triglyceride (TG) level: TG-optimal (n=222), TG-normal (n=146), and TG-high (n=150).

Fig. 2.

Protocol for measuring carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) using the Aixplorer automatic cIMT measurement system and carotid stiffness using ultrafast pulse wave velocity (ufPWV).

A. cIMT was measured using the Aixplorer automatic cIMT measurement system. The white region of interest (ROI) box was placed on the posterior wall of the common carotid artery (CCA) near the bulb, while two white dashed lines automatically traced the carotid intima-media structure. The mean cIMT within the ROI was obtained with a Fit value of 98%. B. Pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole (PWV-BS) and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) were measured using ufPWV. The yellow ROI box covered the anterior and posterior walls of the main CCA, and the red line tracked movement of the anterior and posterior walls in real time. PWV-BS and PWV-ES were considered valid when Δ± was ≤1.0 m/s. C, D. Magnified views of the cIMT and ufPWV measurement regions are shown, respectively. LCCA, left common carotid artery; RCCA, right common carotid artery.

Fig. 3.

Pairwise comparisons of ultrasound parameters among triglyceride (TG) groups in the total population and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subgroups.

Boxplots show pairwise comparisons of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole (PWV-BS), and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) among TG groups in the total population (A–C), the normal LDL-C subgroup (D–F), and the high LDL-C subgroup (G–I). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Fig. 4.

Bar and line graphs of pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) across finer triglyceride (TG) categories in the total population and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) subgroups.

Bar graphs of PWV-ES by finer TG category are shown for the total population (A), the normal LDL-C subgroup (C), and the high LDL-C subgroup (E); all comparisons were made against TG <0.57 mmol/L. ***P<0.001. Line graphs of PWV-ES by finer TG category are shown for the total population (B), the normal LDL-C subgroup (D), and the high LDL-C subgroup (F).

Fig. 5.

Carotid stiffening across carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and Framingham risk score (FRS) subgroups.

The proportions of participants with cIMT ≥0.050 cm (A) and pulse wave velocity at the end of systole (PWV-ES) ≥7.0 m/s (C) are shown across triglyceride (TG) groups. The proportions of participants with cIMT ≥0.050 cm (B) and PWV-ES ≥7.0 m/s (D) are also shown across TG groups stratified by FRS category. Boxplots show pairwise comparisons of PWV-ES among TG groups within the cIMT (E) and FRS (F) subgroups. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Table 1.

Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of study participants grouped by TG level

Total (n=518) TG-optimal (n=222) TG-normal (n=146) TG-high (n=150) P-value
Baseline characteristic
 Male sex (%) 245 (47.3) 92 (41.4) 65 (44.5) 88 (58.7) 0.003
 Age (year) 50.78±12.10 49.12±12.91 51.77±11.05 52.27±11.61 0.024
 BMI (kg/m2) 23.71±3.09 22.53±2.68 24.03±2.95 25.15±3.13 <0.001
 SBP (mmHg) 128.02±16.23 123.66±15.91 129.51±16.02 133.03±15.27 <0.001
 DBP (mmHg) 79.14±11.30 75.56±11.29 80.97±10.51 82.64±10.57 <0.001
 FRS (%) 8.22±7.62 6.63±7.27 8.19±7.37 10.59±7.80 <0.001
Laboratory finding
 TG (mmol/L) 1.24 (0.84–1.79) 0.80 (0.62–0.97) 1.34 (1.23–1.52) 2.22 (1.91–2.81) <0.001
 TC (mmol/L) 4.87±1.01 4.65±0.94 4.98±0.99 5.08±1.06 <0.001
 LDL-C (mmol/L) 2.79±0.81 2.54±0.72 2.95±0.83 3.01±0.82 <0.001
 HDL-C (mmol/L) 1.48 (1.26–1.73) 1.62 (1.39–1.90) 1.50 (1.30–1.72) 1.30 (1.14–1.49) <0.001
 FBG (mmol/L) 5.16 (4.80–5.63) 5.04 (4.67–5.43) 5.25 (4.90–5.80) 5.24 (4.95–5.82) <0.001
 SCr (μmol/L) 66.9 (57.5–78.2) 65.6 (57.4–75.6) 64.2 (56.6–77.4) 72.2 (59.2–84.2) 0.001
Carotid ultrasound finding
 cIMT (cm) 0.056 (0.048–0.066) 0.053 (0.046–0.062) 0.058 (0.052–0.067) 0.057 (0.051–0.067) <0.001
 PWV-BS (m/s) 5.85±1.15 5.86±1.11 5.73±1.12 5.96±1.21 0.231
 PWV-ES (m/s) 7.89±1.71 7.56±1.80 8.02±1.61 8.26±1.57 <0.001

Values are presented as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median (first quartile–third quartile).

P<0.05 indicates statistical significance.

TG, triglyceride; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FRS, Framingham risk score; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; SCr, serum creatinine; cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; PWV-BS, pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole; PWV-ES, pulse wave velocity at the end of systole.

Table 2.

Correlations of major cardiovascular risk factors with cIMT, PWV-BS, and PWV-ES in the total population

cIMT (cm) PWV-BS (m/s) PWV-ES (m/s)
r P-value r P-value r P-value
Age (year) 0.479 <0.001 0.285 <0.001 0.545 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 0.300 <0.001 0.012 0.792 0.177 <0.001
SBP (mmHg) 0.359 <0.001 0.038 0.392 0.300 <0.001
DBP (mmHg) 0.253 <0.001 −0.005 0.901 0.175 <0.001
TG (mmol/L) 0.137 0.002 −0.036 0.416 0.158 <0.001
TC (mmol/L) 0.123 0.005 −0.033 0.451 −0.011 0.795
LDL-C (mmol/L) 0.208 <0.001 −0.039 0.376 0.068 0.120
HDL-C (mmol/L) −0.080 0.068 −0.067 0.130 −0.130 0.003
FBG (mmol/L) 0.271 <0.001 −0.022 0.616 0.087 0.048
SCr (μmol/L) 0.149 0.001 0.156 <0.001 0.131 0.003

cIMT, carotid intima-media thickness; PWV-BS, pulse wave velocity at the beginning of systole; PWV-ES, pulse wave velocity at the end of systole; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; FBG, fasting blood glucose; SCr, serum creatinine.

Table 3.

Odds ratios of PWV-ES among TG groups in the total population and LDL-C subgroups

TG-optimal (Ref) Total (n=518) Normal LDL-C (n=421) High LDL-C (n=97)
TG-normal TG-high TG-normal TG-high TG-normal TG-high
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Model 1 1.17 (1.03–1.32) 0.012 1.27 (1.12–1.44) <0.001 1.16 (1.01–1.33) 0.033 1.22 (1.06–1.39) 0.005 1.26 (0.89–1.79) 0.190 1.56 (1.06–2.29) 0.024
Model 2 1.16 (1.02–1.31) 0.024 1.27 (1.10–1.43) 0.001 1.16 (1.01–1.33) 0.039 1.21 (1.06–1.40) 0.006 1.26 (0.89–1.79) 0.189 1.57 (1.07–2.31) 0.023
Model 3 1.04 (0.88–1.23) 0.617 1.13 (0.94–1.36) 0.203 1.04 (0.86–1.26) 0.675 1.03 (0.85–1.25) 0.744 0.99 (0.64–1.53) 0.961 1.81 (1.00–3.26) 0.048

Model 1: crude; Model 2: Model 1+LDL-C; Model 3: Model 2+age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and serum creatinine. All ORs were calculated with the TG-optimal group as the reference (Ref).

PWV-ES, pulse wave velocity at the end of systole; TG, triglyceride; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.